Prefiguring redistributive housing commons: public–cooperative experiments in Berlin, Rome and Barcelona
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56247/qua.623Keywords:
Housing commons, housing movements, community-led housing initiatives, housing decommodification, adaptive reuse and self-rehabilitationAbstract
This paper examines how movement-led practices are translated into redistributive housing commons through hybrid forms of public–community governance, both existing and potential, in Berlin, Rome, and Barcelona. It situates housing decommodification within post-austerity urban housing crises shaped by rent inflation, touristification, and the financialisation of private rental markets. In these contexts, tenants’ and housing-rights mobilisations have expanded, contributing to more assertive policy repertoires while also consolidating alternatives to market provision, notably right-of-use cooperatives and other collective forms of tenure that are increasingly supported by local institutions. Yet decommodification does not in itself secure redistribution: community-led housing remains niche and often economically inaccessible amid shrinking public assets, rising land and construction costs, financial thresholds linked to debt and entry contributions, as well as complex technical procedures. Drawing on a comparative analysis of three “test sites” — Bethanien, Porto Fluviale, and Casa Orsola — the paper argues that access to vacant or underutilised public assets, adaptive reuse, self-rehabilitation schemes, and municipal acquisition can function as socio-institutional forms of “in-kind support”. By enabling movement-led practices to experiment with prefigurative politics and redistribute agency, these arrangements offer transferable insights for developing housing commons that are more accessible, potentially redistributive, and scalable alongside public housing.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
8
Views
|
2
Downloads
|
|
10
Total
|
|
References
Aalbers, M. B., (2016). The financialisation of housing: A political economy approach. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668666
Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin. (2025). Bericht zur Schaffung von Wohnraum durch die städtischen Wohnungsbaugesellschaften von Berlin 2025: Berichtszeitraum 2024.
Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg. (2025, June 25). Wohnungsbestand steigt weiterhin kontinuierlich.
Aureli, A., & Mudu, P. (2017). Squatting: Reappropriating democracy from the state. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements, 9(1), 497–521.
Azienda Territoriale per l’Edilizia Residenziale Pubblica del Comune di Roma (ATER Roma). (2020). Patrimonio immobiliare.
Belotti, E., & Arbaci, S. (2021). From right to good, and to asset: The state-led financialisation of the social rented housing in Italy. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(2), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420941517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420941517
Bernt, M., Grell, B., & Holm, A. (Eds.). (2013). The Berlin reader: A compendium on urban change and activism. Bielefeld: transcript. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839424780
Blomley, N. (2016). The right not to be excluded. In A. Amin & P. Howel (Eds.), Releasing the Commons: Rethinking the futures of the commons. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673172-6
Boano, C., & Talocci, G. (2014). Fences and profanations: Questioning the sacredness of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 19(5), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.943701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.943701
Cabré, E., & Andrés, A. (2018). La Borda: a case study on the implementation of cooperative housing in Catalonia. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(3), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1331591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1331591
Card, K. (2022). From the streets to the statehouse: how tenant movements affect housing policy in Los Angeles and Berlin. Housing Studies, 39(6), 1395–1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2124236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2124236
Consell Econòmic i Social de Barcelona (CESB) (2025). Informe: El parc de l’habitatge a la ciutat de Barcelona i RMB.
D’Adda, G., Delgado, L., & Sala, E. (2018). Responding to the Precarisation of Housing: A Case Study of PAH Barcelona. In Helen Carr, Brendan Edgeworth and Caroline Hunger (eds), Law and The Precarious Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Home in Insecure Times (HartPublishing) 290.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). Commun: Essai sur la révolution au XXIe siècle. La Découverte. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.dardo.2015.01
De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia Sunt Communia: On the Commons and the Transformation to Postcapitalism. Sed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350221611
Dewilde, C. (2018). Explaining the declined affordability of housing for low-income private renters across Western Europe. Urban Studies, 55(12), 2618-2639. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980177290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017729077
Dewilde, C. (2022). How housing affects the association between low income and living conditions-deprivation across Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 20(1), 373–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab003
Di Felice, E., & Rocco, M. (2023). Dall’autorecupero a nuove forme di rigenerazione dal basso del patrimonio pubblico in disuso: il caso dell’occupazione di Porto Fluviale. Tracce Urbane, 13, 143–168. https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/18174
Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x
Durose, C., Richardson, L., Rozenburg, M., Ryan, M., & Escobar, O. (2021). Community control in the housing commons: A conceptual typology. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), 291–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1093
Ferreri, M., & Vidal, L. (2021). Public-cooperative policy mechanisms for housing commons. International Journal of Housing Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2021.1877888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2021.1877888
Fields, D. & Uffer, S. (2016) The financialisation of rental housing: a comparative analysis of New York city and Berlin. Urban Studies, 53, 1486–1502. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26151125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014543704
Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2016). The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34(2), 281–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2653084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2653084
García-Lamarca, M. (2020). Real estate crisis resolution regimes and residential REITs: emerging socio-spatial impacts in Barcelona. Housing Studies, 36(9), 1407–1426. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1769034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1769034
Gil García, J., & Martínez López, M. A. (2023). State-Led Actions Reigniting the Financialisation of Housing in Spain. Housing, Theory and Society, 40(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2021.2013316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2021.2013316
Grazioli, M., & Caciagli, C. (2018). Resisting to the neoliberal urban fabric: Housing rights movements and the re-appropriation of the “right to the city” in Rome, Italy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 29(4), 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9977-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9977-y
Grazioli, M. (2021), Rethinking Public Housing Through Squatting. The Case of Housing Rights Movements in Rome. PACO, 14(2), 788-805.
Guisan, A. O. T., Liu, T., & Gerber, J.-D. (2025). Housing Commons? A Scoping Review. International Journal of the Commons, 19(1), pp. 158–172. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1490
Harloe, M. (1995). The people’s home? Social rented housing in Europe and America. Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712825
Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099414
Holm, A., & Kuhn, A. (2011). Squatting and urban renewal: The interaction of squatter movements and strategies of urban restructuring in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.001009.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.001009.x
Holm, A., Alexandri, G., & Bernt, M. (Eds.) (2023). Housing Policy under the Conditions of Financialisation: The Impact of Institutional Investors on Affordable Housing in European Cities. SciencePo.
Hurlin, L. (2019). Mietshäuser Syndikat: Collective ownership, the “housing question” and degrowth. In A. Nelson & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (207–220). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315151205-21
Insolera, I. (2001). Roma moderna: Un secolo di storia urbanistica, 1870–1970. Einaudi. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. ISTAT (2021). Censimento permanente della popolazione e delle abitazioni: Roma Capitale (Abitazioni; anno 2021).
Katz, S., & Mayer, M. (1985). Gimme shelter: Self-help housing struggles within and against the state in New York City and West Berlin. In M. Gottdiener & N. Komninos (Eds.), Capitalist development and crisis theory (277–296). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1985.tb00419.x
Kemeny, J. (2006). Corporatism and Housing Regimes. Housing, Theory and Society, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090500375423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090500375423
Knorr-Siedow, T. (2008). Innovations from below? A new concept for social housing in Germany. In Kathleen Scanlon & Christine Whitehead (ed.), Social Housing in Europe II: a review of policies and outcomes. LSE, London, 131-144.
Leach, D. K. (2013). Prefigurative politics. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopaedia of social and political movements. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm167
Leyva del Río, S. (2022). Conceptualising the commons as a relational triad: Lessons from the grant of use cooperative housing model in Barcelona. Geoforum, 136, 112–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.09.007
Madden, D., & Marcuse, P. (2016). In defence of housing: The politics of crisis. London: Verso.
Mayer, M. (2009). The “right to the city” in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 13(2–3), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982755
Mayer, M. (2013). First world urban activism. City, 17(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.757417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.757417
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803987
Miraftab, F. (2004). Invited and invented spaces of participation: Neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notion of politics. Wagadu, 1, 1–7.
Miralles Buil, D. (2020). Housing cooperatives in Barcelona, between the commons and social production of habitat: A step towards housing communalisation in Barcelona? ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 19(3), 665–683.
Mudu, P., & Rossini, L. (2017). Occupations of housing and social centers in Rome: A durable resistance to neoliberalism and institutionalisation. In M. A. Martínez López (Ed.), The urban politics of squatters’ movements (99–120). Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95314-1_5
Observatori de l’Habitatge de Barcelona. (2024). Informe anual 2023.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Pruijt, H. (2003). Is the institutionalisation of urban movements inevitable? A comparison of the opportunities for sustained squatting in New York City and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00436
Rolnik, R. (2013). Late neoliberalism: The financialisation of homeownership and housing rights. I nternational j ournal o f u rban a nd r egional r esearch, 3 7(3), 1058-1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12062
Rossi, I., Esposito, A., Brollo, B., Festa, D., Celata, F., & Alleva, G. (2025). Il disagio abitativo a Roma.
Rossini, L. (2020). Lazio (Italy). In Baiges, C., Ferreri, M., & Vidal, L. ed. (2020). International policies to promote cooperative housing. La Dinamo Fundació. ladinamo.org
Rossini, L., Martínez, M. A., & García Bernardos, A. (2023). The configuration of a multi-pronged housing movement in Barcelona. PACO, 16(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v16i1p63
Rossini, L. (2024). Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies. PlaNext – Next Generation Planning, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/99
Rossini, L., D’Adda, G. (2025). Turning Tactics into Strategy: The Right to Stay Put and the Decommodification of Housing in Barcelona. Critical Housing Analysis, 12(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2025.12.1.589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2025.12.1.589
Scanlon, K. & Whitehead, C. (2008). Social Housing in Europe II: a review of policies and outcomes. LSE.
Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). (2024). Wohnen: Eigentumsquote (Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2022).
Stephens, M., Elsinga, M., & Knorr-Siedow, T. (2008). The privatisation of social housing: Three different pathways. In K. Scanlon & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Social housing in Europe II: A review of policies and outcomes (105–129). LSE London.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813245
Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Tulumello, S., & Dagkouli-Kyriakoglou, M. (2024). Housing Financialisation and the State, in and Beyond Southern Europe: A Conceptual and Operational Framework. Housing, Theory and Society, 41(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2279529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2279529
Tummers, L. (2016). The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2023–2040. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26151181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586696
Vasudevan, A. (2011). Dramaturgies of dissent: The spatial politics of squatting in Berlin, 1968–.Social & Cultural Geography, 12(3), 283–303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26151181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.564734
Vidal, L. (2019). Cooperative islands in capitalist waters: Limited-equity housing cooperatives, urban renewal and gentrification. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12726
Wijburg, G. (2021). The de-financialisation of housing: towards a research agenda. Housing Studies, 36(8), 1276-1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1762847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1762847
Wijburg, G., Waldron, R. (2024). Social movements against housing financialisation: an introduction to the special issue. Critical Housing Analysis, 11(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2024.11.1.564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2024.11.1.564
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Quaderns de l'Institut Català d'Antropologia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Use and Distribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Funding data
-
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Grant numbers CEECIND/04070/2018

